Shiba Inu: The official Shibarium account remains silent and the SHIB community is worried!

The official Shibarium account has not published anything since July 13, 2026, while the network is undergoing a technical reconstruction phase. This absence does not prove the abandonment of the blockchain, but it deprives its users of a reliable channel at a time when the explorer remains partially indexed and activity is slowing down.

In brief

• Shibarium has remained silent on its official account since July 13, 2026, raising concerns within the SHIB community.
• The blockchain remains operational, despite slowed activity and an unfinished reindexing of blocks.
• The lack of transparency fuels doubts about the governance of the network and the management of its official channels.
• The Shiba Inu community is awaiting clear answers regarding the progress of the work and the return of regular communication.

Four months without communication from Shibarium, and very concrete questions

The X account @shibariumnet was used to disseminate announcements regarding updates, incidents, and the evolution of the layer 2 blockchain associated with Shiba Inu. Its silence has now lasted nearly four months, with no public explanation or announced date for the resumption of publications.

This situation therefore goes beyond the simple management of a social network. For users, several essential pieces of information remain difficult to obtain from a clearly identified source.

The main areas of uncertainty now concern:

• The identity of the individuals controlling the official account;
• The reason for the interruption of publications since July 13;
• The timeline of the work currently being carried out on Shibarium;
• The actual state of services during the reindexing of the blockchain.

A historical member of the community, known by the pseudonym Mazrael, claims that some holders of access are deliberately maintaining several inactive accounts. He accuses them of taking advantage of this silence to promote other tokens. This statement fuels tensions, but it remains an unverified allegation and does not constitute an official explanation.

The precedent is not limited to the Shibarium account. As early as March, community members were calling for greater transparency regarding validators, ecosystem tokens, and the reorganization of the team. They felt that essential updates were coming too rarely.

An active blockchain is not enough to reassure its users

The silence of the account does not mean that Shibarium has stopped functioning. Its explorer displayed about 1,020 daily transactions at the time of the publication of the source article, compared to a recent peak of 6,370 on October 31. The network continues to produce blocks, even though its activity remains low.

Shibariumscan also indicates that 65% of the blocks have been reindexed. This operation may temporarily render some data incomplete or difficult to consult. It does not, by itself, allow us to conclude that there is a network failure or an abandonment of the project.

The problem lies rather in the absence of explanations accompanying these works. When an explorer presents partial data, an official channel should normally specify the services concerned, the progress of the intervention, and any precautions to be taken. Without these indications, users must interpret provisional technical information on their own.

Developer Kaal Dhairya had briefly reappeared in October. When asked about the person financing the maintenance of Shibarium, he replied: , indicating that he was personally covering the costs. His statement suggested that the network was not abandoned, but it did not specify its budget or long-term funding model.

The Real Test Now Lies in Governance

For Shibarium, trust does not depend solely on the number of transactions or the price of SHIB. It also relies on the team's ability to quickly authenticate information. A silent official account leaves more room for rumors, fake profiles, and fraudulent announcements that could target token holders.

This fragility is particularly significant for an ecosystem largely driven by its community. Unlike a strictly technical infrastructure, Shibarium also depends on its brand, social relays, and the mobilization of the . When access to communication channels seems opaque, the governance of the project itself becomes a risk subject.

An isolated resumption of publications would therefore only address part of the problem. The team should also clearly identify the responsible parties for its accounts, publish a status of the works, and designate a reference source for technical incidents.

The next relevant signal will not only be an increase in transactions. It will be necessary to monitor the publication of a reindexing schedule, a clarification on the control of @shibariumnet, and the return of regular technical feedback. Without these elements, Shibarium may remain operational while continuing to lose a more difficult asset to rebuild: the trust of its users.